South Africa’s local and provincial governments are central to delivering essential services and fostering socio-economic development. However, a series of recent media reports have revealed significant shortcomings. Mismanagement of public funds, failure to deliver basic services, and a lack of effective leadership indicate a deeper governance crisis. While King IV covers governance best practice, a failure to apply its principles has presumably contributed to these challenges.
Corruption at Rustenburg Local Municipality reportedly surrounds the leasing of land and unauthorised connections to municipal services, costing millions of rands.[1] These actions have not only undermined the financial stability of the municipality but have also left the community vulnerable.
Similarly, a questionable payment of R2 million by Joe Gqabi Municipality, meant for VIP toilets, reportedly disappeared after a contractor provided no services.[2] The reported involvement of a municipal official in the company that received these funds points to severe gaps in governance controls and accountability.
Governance shortcomings at the provincial level have been just as concerning, with recent reports revealing that the Gauteng Legislature has struggled to recover irregularly pocketed funds by MPLs and staff[3]. Furthermore, in Mpumalanga, delays in providing learning materials to under-resourced schools have reportedly left students unprepared for final exams.[4]
Across the country, municipalities in the North West, Free State, and Eastern Cape reportedly owe waterboards over R11 billion, and essential municipal infrastructure grants have apparently been returned to the National Treasury due to underperformance.[5]
Then, the eThekwini metro municipality has faced a prolonged water crisis, with contradictory figures being cited for the cost of repairs. At different points, the metro claimed it required R110 billion, R130 billion, and most recently, R44 billion to address infrastructure backlogs.[6] Naturally, this raises questions about the competence and financial acumen of those in charge.
The Role of Boards and Audit Committees
A critical aspect of good governance is the role played by Boards and Audit Committees in maintaining accountability and oversight. King IV emphasises that these structures play a key governance role.
Audit Committees are specifically mandated to oversee financial reporting. The reported financial mismanagement and irregularities in municipalities indicate that these structures have not fulfilled their oversight duties adequately.
The Auditor-General’s recent consolidated report on local government audit outcomes again highlighted significant shortcomings across municipalities.[7] The findings indicate that “local government is losing billions of rand each year because of poor decisions, neglect or inefficiencies”. Fruitless and wasteful expenditure increased to R7,41 billion, with municipalities disclosing R27,59 billion worth of irregular expenditure. The report lists Audit Committees as key role players in the accountability ecosystem for “providing an independent view of the effectiveness of municipal controls and processes”. In addition, the report notes that the Council also plays a significant role in “investigating and dealing with unauthorised, irregular, and fruitless and wasteful expenditure; fraud and corruption; and any transgressions and non-performance”.
Professionalisation
A significant governance concern contributing to these challenges is the practice of cadre deployment. Reports indicate that politically connected individuals are often appointed to leadership positions in the public sector, prioritising loyalty over competence and ethics. As Feriel Haffajee recently noted in an article[8], “cadre deployment… is a key factor crashing Johannesburg’s water supply,” raising serious concerns about the capacity of individuals placed in critical positions. She further questioned the skills and experience of the “bloated board” overseeing Joburg Water, highlighting how politically motivated appointments have led to operational inefficiencies.
While cadre deployment is often defended as a means to ensure political alignment, it has reportedly undermined professionalism and weakened institutional capacity in both local and provincial governments. This issue has been extensively scrutinised, with the State Capture Commission finding that cadre deployment is both unconstitutional and illegal[9], as it compromises merit-based appointments and erodes accountability.
King IV advocates for leadership appointments based on merit, integrity, and competence. Appointing leaders with the necessary skills and commitment to public service is critical for ensuring accountability and driving effective governance.
This aligns with the continuous advocacy efforts of the Institute of Directors in South Africa for the professionalisation of directors through enforced membership of, and certification by, the professional body. Similarly, the Auditor-General’s report highlights the need for professionalising and capacitating local government, stating that “skills and capacity gaps can be addressed through a concerted effort to support and implement local government professionalisation initiatives.”
Implementing King IV for Better Governance
Despite the challenges, King IV offers a roadmap for overcoming these governance concerns. The Code, when applied effectively, can help local and provincial governments improve control, accountability, and ultimately service delivery.
At its core, King IV calls for leadership grounded in integrity, fairness, and transparency.
Furthermore, internal controls are crucial for financial oversight. By adopting King IV’s practices on performance, reporting and assurance, municipalities and provincial governments can ensure that public funds are spent efficiently.
Very importantly, boards and audit committees should take a more proactive role in holding management accountable. By enforcing financial controls and regularly reviewing governance practices, these structures can prevent future mismanagement.
The governance challenges in South Africa’s local and provincial governments are significant, but they are not insurmountable. By fully embracing the principles of King IV, municipalities and provincial governments can improve their performance, enhance service delivery, and restore public trust. Improved governance will lead to better resource management, increased socio-economic development, and more equitable access to essential services.
Ultimately, South Africa’s future depends on the ability of its government entities to be governed effectively.
For more articles like this [Business%20Link.]click here.
If you enjoyed this website then check out our other sites: Wedding and Function, Home Food and Travel, Kids Connection, Thirsty Traveler, Bargain Buys, Boat Trips for Africa.
Need help with your online marketing then visit Agency One.